Young Earth, Old and Stupid Theories
Judging from the latest I have been reading, seeing and listening to, all the "scientific" theories about "gradual" earth development and the age of the earth itself is all hogwash.
Tons of web sites out there tout theories from a bucketload of "alternative" scientists who think that the Grand Canyon, for example, was carved out of the desert suddenly by a massive water flow in ages past -- not by the Colorado River over "millions" of years.
Other experts see Mars and Venus as the culprits who, in ancient orbits, got too close to the Earth and caused upheavals that created the major mountain ranges we know as the Andes, Rockies, Sierra Nevada and Himalayas.
Jupiter has an upper atmosphere temperature of 300 degrees F, hotter than an oven, and it is monstrous, which means that all its satellites are impacted by enormous heat instead of being "cold." One of Saturn's remote moons was recently photographed spouting a massive liquid water geyser ... hey, that's at least 32 degrees F and its supposed to be 200 degrees below zero out there.
What gives? The volcanoes on Mars are way too big for a planet that size. There are way too many craters and lavalike "mares" on our own Moon for God's sake.
Noah's flood? It happened. Every ancient civilization records it.
Dinosaurs? Recent. All dating methods, including Carbon 14 and potassium-argon, are flawed because they assume controlled, constant, dead-even environments for "millions" of years on end.
Face it. Science sucks. The Bible thumpers are far closer to reality. Just look around you.
Greenland's melting. Fast. So is Antarctica. Hey, they used to be green at one time. They will be green again. It might be the end of regular life as we know it further in toward the equator, but so what? The tundra will melt and come alive with all kinds of life. We'll all have to move North. The Inuit will have to eat deer meat instead of whale blubber.
More to come ...
Project Seek: Onassis, Kennedy and the Gemstone Thesis
There’s More Where This Came From
.
- Radreview's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 472 reads
Stupid theories!
Of all the stupid theories around the ones proposed by the religious community are the worst of all! (See my refutation of current religions at http://bloggerparty.com/blog/gnosisquest )
There is not a single theory in either the New or Old Testament which can't be refuted and basing any knowledge on it is "Blind Faith".
It is just as stupid as the green in Greenland; Greenland got its name to encourage immigration.
Best RG
Behind every excuse lies a failure, to justify a failure only compounds its magnitude.
I would argue that ...
... there isn't a single theory from pure science (such as the "big bang" creation story which is as stupid as it gets) tghat can't be refuted by looking at existing evidence. Lack of sufficient fossil transition forms (evolution), the documented inaccuracies of carbon-14 and potassium-argon dating (myth of "old earth) and many, many others.
Project Seek: Onassis, Kennedy and the Gemstone Thesis
There’s More Where This Came From
.
So either way we go...
One of you will think we are "stupid." Wow as much fun as that sounds like, maybe Ill just stay out of this one.
Later
Arguing
Whatever Radreview, I won’t bother you with details, believe as you want.
Best RG
Behind every excuse lies a failure, to justify a failure only compounds its magnitude.