Yes, why polygamy? Well, why not?

Marriage is defined as the legal union of two people, a man and a woman as husband and wife. Beautiful.

But now this definition is open for scrutiny. Homosexuals want that it should be flexible to mean: a union of two people, not necessarily a man and a woman. Fine if they want it to be that way we can stretch the definition of marriage to the union of two loving human beings of any sexes.

While the definition can be strecthed on the basis of gender, the point is why cannot it be stretched on the basis of number. How about this definition of marriage: A marriage is a union of two or any number of people as husbands and wife or wives and husbands. Whats wrong? As long as people are loving and willing but not hurting in a union, it should have legal sanction.

The point again is if marriage can mean the union of two members of any sex then why cannot it be modified to include more then two members.

People have the freedom to chose their
sexual preferences and marriage partners. Thats why homosexuality has been accepted. If it's nobody's business who X sleeps with it should be nobody's business how many people he/she sleeps with. If it's legit for X to marry Y of the same sex or Z of the opposite sex why cannot be it be legit for X to marry A, B and C as long as X, A, B and C are willing.

Just as gender should not be an issue, should number be?