The RITALIN Made Me Do It!

Submitted by realitycheck on March 14, 2006 - 7:22am.

Remember the Scott Pittmen case from last year? A 12 year old boy on Prozac kills his grandparents, burns down the house in which they live, hides in the woods and fabricates a story to police?

Ritalin, a drug that is used to calm super hyper children down…right? Tell me this, if this is a good drug to give children, then why is it in the same category as morphine, opium, and cocaine? This drug category happens to be the highest potential for abuse.

Well if it’s so bad then Why are doctors prescribing this drug so often?

Ritalin is an amphetamine-like drug widely prescribed to children for the alleged mental disorder Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) a psychiatric label for children who fidget or are inattentive
Despite the lack of any scientific basis for this alleged psychiatric malady, children are being drugged by the millions with this cocaine-like substance even though Ritalin's manufacturer warns that "...frank psychotic episodes can occur with abusive use" and psychiatry's Diagnostic & Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (the DSM) states that the major complication of Ritalin withdrawal is suicide!
If this were not bad enough, more than 900,000 children and adolescents between the ages of six and eighteen are now on prescribed psychiatric anti-depressant drugs. These drugs, particularly the newer anti-depressants, such as Prozac, Zoloft and Luvox called SSRIs, are also tied by extensive research and all too many news headlines to acts of violence and suicide. In fact, in just one four-year-period, between 1988 and 1992, there were reports of more than 90 children and adolescents who had suffered suicidal or violent self-destructive behavior while on Prozac.

SO IS THIS A ONE-OF-A-KIND DEAL?
No. This is all to common. I could list 300 instances, but here’s eleven:

1.. On May 25, 1997, 18-year-old Jeremy Strohmeyer raped and murdered a 7-year-old African American girl in Las Vegas, Nevada. Strohmeyer had been diagnosed with ADD and prescribed Dexedrine, a Ritalin-like drug, immediately prior to the killing.

2. On October 1st, 1997, in Pearl Mississippi, 16-year-old Luke Woodham stabbed his mother, 50-year-old Mary Woodam, to death and then went to his high school where he shot nine people - killing two teenage girls and wounding seven others. Published reports say he was on Prozac.

3. Exactly two months later on Dec 1, 1997, Michael Carneal, a 14-year-old, opened fire on students at a high school prayer meeting in West Paducah, Kentucky. Three teenagers were killed, five others were wounded, one of whom was paralyzed. Carneal was reportedly on Ritalin.

4. Then in February, 1998 a young man in Huntsville, Alabama, while on Ritalin went psychotic - chopping up his parents with an ax and also killing one sibling and almost murdering another.

5. On March 24, 1998 in Jonesboro, Arkansas, 11-year-old Andrew Golden and 14-year-old Mitchell Johnson shot 15 people killing four students, one teacher, and wounding 10 others. According to one report, the boys were believed to be on Ritilan.

6. Two months later another grisly school massacre occurred. On May 21, 1998 15-year-old Kip Kinkel of Springfield, Oregon murdered his parents and proceeded to his high school where he went on a rampage killing two students and wounding 22 others. Kinkel had been prescribed both Prozac and Ritalin.

7. On April 16th, 1999, 15-year-old Shawn Cooper of Notus, Idaho took a 12-guage shot gun to school and started firing, injuring one student and holding the school hostage for about 20 minutes. Terrified students ran for their lives, some barricading themselves in classrooms. Cooper had been taking Ritalin when he fired the shotgun's rounds.

8. The incident in Idaho did not make the national press (no one, thank God, was killed). But all that changed four days later when 18-year-old Eric Harris killed 12 students and a teacher at Columbine High School before killing himself. Harris was on one of the SSRI anti-depressants called Luvox.

9. One month later to the day, on May 20th of this year TJ Solomon, a 15-year-old high school student in Conyers, Georgia, while on Ritalin opened fire on and wounded six of his classmates. Thankfully, none were killed.

10. Then there's 14-year-old Rod Mathews who had been prescribed Ritalin since the third grade and beat a classmate to death with a bat.

11. And 19-year-old James Wilson who had been on psychiatric drugs for 5 years and took a .22 caliber revolver into an elementary school in Greenwood, South Carolina killing two young girls, and wounding seven other children and two teachers!

STOP! WE HAVE THE WRONG CULPRIT!!

So what is the solution?
79 percent of hyperactive children improved when suspect foods were eliminated from their diets, only to become worse again when the foods were reintroduced. Artificial colorings and flavorings were the most serious culprits; sugar was also found to have a noticeable effect."
Another excellent study based on the Fiengold diet involved 276 youths at a detention facility in Virginia who were put on the diet for two years.
The results? Insubordination dropped 55 percent, theft decreased 77 percent, and hyperactivity fell 65 percent.
The most remarkable study of the diet was conducted over a four-year-period on a million school children in 803 public schools in New York City. The schools eliminated foods containing artificial flavors, colors and preservatives from the school cafeterias and also reduced the amount of sugar that was available. The results were startling.

MY OPINION:
I think an EIGTH GRADER (Matt Scherve) from Bethesda, Maryland summed it up best:

"Schools don't like extremists who like to think and question. They are dreamers. That doesn't mean that they are wrong. They just don't fit the norm, so they are labeled and damned, labeled as A.D.D. (Attention Deficit Disorder).
So the doctors dope us up with Ritalin and control our minds with low doses of speed. The teachers pay us no mind until our minds are under control. It screws up our train of thought and makes us one-dimensional. We get headaches and almost depressed getting on and off it. It takes away extra imagination and flow of mind, hence destroying the true, purest ideas of my mind. I can't think right, and for six hours of the day, I'm not me. I'm what the system would like me to be.
The schools should shape our education around our idiosyncratic minds, our quaint minds, our quirky minds, our crackpot minds, our curious minds. Where would we be without eccentric people? We need them. The system should not shape our minds with dope and low doses of speed; the system should be shaped around us.
Ritalin does not help me learn; it simply lowers my mind down between the selected lines in which we are taught. Who's going to get further in life, the schmo with the same textbook answers and ideas, or the "A.D.D. kid" who can offer ideas that have never been thought of or a new perspective on something?
I truly look forward to the day when Ritalin isn't an answer. To the day when every student is labeled 'learner.'"

Do you like hot Debates? If so please share your opinion:

http://bloggerparty.com/corrupt_police_face_no_punishment_why

SOURCES:

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=6249

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Ritalin and Prozac

#51934 On March 14, 2006 8:00am Tamiya said,
Tamiya's picture

These are waaaay over prescribed.. People are so much quicker to just give kids drugs instead of figuring out what the REAL problem is.

Really hot under the collar today, Reality

#51935 On March 14, 2006 8:01am o ceallaigh said,
o ceallaigh's picture

The thought police will be after you. Also Tottie and gom jabbar. :)

You appear to be in the camp that dismisses ADD and ADHD. I don't have experience or knowledge to comment. I have had entirely too much direct experience with the class of selective-serotonin-reuptake-inhibitor drugs (SSRIs). No I will not. It's enough to say that the associated conditions are most often real ones, for which we have too little understanding of the causes and extremely inadequate tools for their care. When we knew even less than we know now, the conditions were all dismissed as "melancholia", or "boys being boys", or "God's curse", and treatment was a stiff uppercut, a lobotomy, or the insane asylum. Today's tools are a lot better than these. But they are far from perfect, and when people (physicians and patients) dole them out as magic bullets, well ...

I have long been worried about, not only the foods that we dish out to ourselves, but the conditions under which we dole them out. I am specifically speaking of the haste, and pace, and especially the loneliness. Fast food (that includes the breakfast bar as well as Mickey D's) induces obesity and madness - the French, who until very recently sat down to dinner with family, ate all kinds of fatty foods and yet remained thin, until they became ensnared in the Golden Arches.

One more thought that will get me killed. Before this century, some 20% of babies born in America died before their first birthday. Now practically every child survives to reproductive age. And we see all these niggly things: the extremes of hyper- or hypoactivity, the allergies, the sensitivities to foods and other stuff in the environment, the chronic this-that-and-the-other... Is it just possible that these were the kinds of things that were being eliminated by infant death before the age of heroic medicine?

No that's wrong...

#51948 On March 14, 2006 9:04am realitycheck said,
realitycheck's picture

No O'c, I definately don't dismiss ADD and ADHD. I will put it to you like this:
I have had "Legal Insomnia" since I was 12 years old. It has been a huge factor in my life. When I was first diagnosed I was given sleeping pills - by the hundreds. So by the time I was 16 I was heavily addicted. I needed to take triple the prescribed amount to even consider sleeping. It took me until March 13, 2005 to get off them. It was a long, terrible struggle.
Tell me this, why were the doctors so quick to prescribe me drugs? I was 12 for Petes sake! And, unlike others, I am very fortunate to have been able to kick the habit.
I feel that there are many drugs that shouldn't be handed out like candy.
ADHD and ADD is a very real thing, but as studies have shown, there are WAY too many children being administered this drug who may not need it.
As you know, just because a child is hyper active doesn't mean they need drugs. Just because a child has problems sleeping doesn't mean we should sedate them.

ugh

#51951 On March 14, 2006 9:21am o ceallaigh said,
o ceallaigh's picture

I'm sorry this happened to you. Happy to discuss it further offline if you like (I think my "personal message" function is working, it gets shut off for no reason from time to time). Too many variables and personal things for a blog chat, in my judgment.

Physicians (forgive my pedantry, I'm a Doctor but can't set your broken leg :) ) vary. Some are more pill-happy than others. And the medical system in your time made it difficult for any but media megastars to be able to afford to "pick and choose". As HMOs and other "cost-cutting" devices impinged on the salaries and choices of physicians (not to mention patients), they responded, in some cases anyway, by relying on magic bullets. If there's a pill and it is relevant to the case, they're tempted to prescribe it and get the patient out of the office so (s)he can see the next one and maybe make enough money to pay the rent. OK, the note on the Lexus.

And the idea of advertising prescription medicines on the mass media is new in the past decade or so. Which adds the further pressure by patients on physicians, "I saw this on Dr. Phil. Give it to me."

Once again, every person, every situation is different. These are gross generalities. They may be true for the mass. They may not be true for anybody's specific case. Perhaps that's my overarching point. We don't pay enough attention to specific cases.

So true O'C

#51954 On March 14, 2006 9:31am realitycheck said,
realitycheck's picture

What you said is all to true. "The note on the Lexus" - it's funny but it's not a lie.
You know what, I didn't even think about the "I saw it on Dr.Phil" scenario, but that's a great point. I'm sure everybody has seen one of those shows, or even a commercial about a drug and thought, "Maybe that's what I need." And unfortunatley most doctors don't thoroughly do research to find out if that drug is even right for the patient.

About the private message thign, I have not had that for like 3 weeks. I actually thought it was removed as a whole. Do we still have that function? I liked it.

Private messaging

#51957 On March 14, 2006 9:43am o ceallaigh said,
o ceallaigh's picture

Yep, it's still there. Problem is, it keeps shutting itself off. One has to go into one's account, find the toggle button to enable it, and make sure it's "on". Brenda-behind-the-curtain told me about two weeks ago that there was a software incompatibility problem that kept switching off the function. I haven't noticed the problem lately, perhaps she's solved the software glitch.

Wouldn't You Rather Be Depressed Than Dead?

#56252 On April 20, 2006 11:00pm violettak said,
violettak's picture

The Dr. Phil argument is a good one. I think one of the big problems is that people trust these celebrities too much and dismiss their doctor's opinion because he's not an "expert" like Dr. Phil or Oprah or whatever guest was on the show that day. There seems to be a large concentration in our society of people that don't question information that's given to them. To me, the idea of seeing something on a talk show and taking it as fact is ludicrous. People care about trends and celebrity more than they care about their own children's health.

So, we think because we've listened to someone's story about how Ritalin cured their child or watched some anti-pyschotic presription drug commercial that we know what needs to be done. We're medicating ourselves according to an ad campaign that has nobody's safety in mind.

I've heard of anti-depressant and anti-psychotic drugs that list suicide as a possible effect. I'd take crying myself to sleep over living the rest of my life in a coffin any damned day of the week.

Existential Intellection From the Bible Belt

Just fixed it

#51959 On March 14, 2006 10:16am realitycheck said,
realitycheck's picture

All right, my private messaging works now. I thought I'd write this for anybody who may be having the same issues:

On the left hand side of the page, under "subscriptions" you should have a selection that says, "View Inbox". If you don't have this simply go to "My account" and "Edit Blog". Select "Allow Private Messages" and your inbox will be set up!

And if marketing the drugs

#56262 On April 21, 2006 6:05am IntricateGirl said,
IntricateGirl's picture

And if marketing the drugs alone wasn't bad enough, look at the way they market them. I watched an episode of Bill Maher recently, and he showed a clip of a Nasonex commercial. You know, the ones with the poorly animated CGI bee. They rattle off a whole list of side effects, and then the bee chimes in "A wise decision." What is a wise decision?? The headache, viral infection, or blood-tinged mucus? I saw another commercial for some medicine to treat Irritable Bowel Syndrome. While they are telling the side effects, it shows people sitting around in a big auditorium, smiling and as happy as you please. I personally think it's slightly twisted to show happy people while you are talking about constipation.

Even medical organizations are catching onto the idea. On a colon cancer screening public service announcement, it has a group of people cheering when their name is called. Now, this is certainly important, and I'm all in favor of everyone getting checked for colon cancer. But let's not bullshit each other. It's not one of the more pleasant experiences most people will go through, and these people on the commercial who are falling all over themselves to thank their doctors come across as the seediest of perverts instead of concerned people who are taking an active part in caring for their own health.

I see the Dr. Phil shows as just a variation on this idea. It sends the message that Ritalin cures all your ills and you should ignore any side effects. That should not be true of any medicine.

Drugs and ADHD

#64778 On May 10, 2007 2:55am indianpedi said,
indianpedi's picture

I have read these posts with interest. I am a practising Pediatrician in India and I see lots of ADHD cases.
But I must tell you that we don NOT get Ritalin and Ritalin-like drugs easily in India. They were not introduced here until just a couple of years ago, and 99.99999% medical stores don't stock them.
That's the situation today, but it may change in future - as soon as parents here discover the almost magical effects of the drug!

I have, in my blog here ( www.bloggerparty.com/blog/indianpedi ) written an article called Hyperactivity and Attention Deficit disorders, where I have tlked about the various 'alternative' methods of treatment available in ADHD, with an emphasis on Ayurveda, the Indian System of medicine.

I agree that Ritalin and drugs in this category should be kept at an arm's length, whenever possible and I would like to add my voice to yours, in doing this.
indianpedi ( Dr. Jayashree Joshi )

Medicines! So harmful to the

#70656 On November 22, 2007 10:39am bsdwork said,

Medicines! So harmful to the stomach but still can't live without them! I dono what I'd do without drugs.:|

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.