At great deal has been said about censoring blogs and objectionable content.

Filters are used to screen out keywords and admin is deleting blogs and modifying them at will.

So it occurred to me that a Code of ethics should be agreed upon but I am not capable of solely identifying these ethics.

I have some basic ethics I think might work but your input is needed:

A Blogger must blog.

Those blogs should be of the writer's creation and original.

A commenter on blogs should also be providing content.

Comments on blogs should be of substantial input.

Bloggers are not required to comment on every blog or on any comment made on those comments.

No blogger is required to read another blogger's post.

Each blogger should respect the efforts put forth by fellow blogger to create content.

Blogs should not be censored or edited by others. Freedom of speech.

Treat each blogger and their works with the same respect you desire for yourself and your works.

Review other blogs with an open mind, giving the writer the chance to convey their idea as you would desire the same thing.

No blogger is any better a blogger than another, positions of contempt suppress ideas and creativity.

Feel free to add or dispute any of the codes, so we may arrive at an agreeable understanding of the Blogger's Code of Ethics.

Geminigma


Related:

Anger, fear, aggression; the dark side of the Force are they. Easily they flow, quick to join you in a fight. If once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will