<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://bloggerparty.com">
<channel>
 <title>Blogger Party - rapists</title>
 <link>http://bloggerparty.com/taxonomy/term/51458/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Should there be a MINIMUM Age to MARRY?</title>
 <link>http://bloggerparty.com/should_there_be_a_minimum_age_to_marry</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was reading the news today and found a great debate.  It ties in with yesterdays blog to; &lt;a href=&quot;http://bloggerparty.com/whats_the_appropriate_punishment_for_interent_predators&quot;&gt;Internet Predators &amp;amp; Sex With Minors&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is what the headline read:  KANSAS LAW MAKERS MAY DO AWAY WITH CHILD BRIDES&lt;br /&gt;
 After a pregnant 14-year-old from Nebraska drove to Kansas last year to marry her 22-year-old boyfriend, now serving time for having sex with the minor, Kansas lawmakers decided it was time the set a minimum marriage age.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/child_brides">child brides</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/juvinille_brides">juvinille brides</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tag/predators">predators</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/rapists">rapists</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/sex_with_minors">sex with minors</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/underage_marriage">underage marriage</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 14:58:13 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RAPE is NOT a LIFE THREATENING Situation, says the D.A.</title>
 <link>http://bloggerparty.com/rape_is_not_a_life_threatening_situation_says_the_d_a</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING:  This will disturb you to say the least:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The DA&#039;s office does NOT consider rape to be a life-threatening assault. THIS MEANS they will charge anyone who uses lethal force in self-defense against a rapist with SECOND DEGREE MURDER or attempted murder. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Surprisingly, many agree with this!  In a poll taken, 49% of people feel that rape is not a crime that one should loose his life over, another 25% feel that rape is awful and the victim should only use violence as a LAST RESOURT, 10% feel that lethal force is needed and the remainder is undecided!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/crime">crime</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/criminals">criminals</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/hot_debates">Hot Debates</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tag/murder">murder</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tag/rape">rape</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/rapists">rapists</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/realitychecks_hot_debates_0">realitychecks Hot Debates</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/weapons">weapons</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:13:10 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Should the Sexually Abused be charged with RAPE?</title>
 <link>http://bloggerparty.com/should_the_sexually_abused_be_charged_with_rape</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- google_ad_section_start --&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The amount of reported Rapes is a growing by the year.  Courts across the United States are flooded with cases involving sexual predators, petafiles and rapists.  Everyone from NBA players to priests to school teachers and laywers themselves have been accused of rape.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prior to 1999 there was only one way to claim a person didn&#039;t committ rape - say it wasn&#039;t them.  Jenny Carter, a lawyer from WA says, &quot;To prove your clients innocence you simply had to prove that they were not at the location or disprove the witnesses credibility.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- google_ad_section_end --&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/adults">adults</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tag/children">children</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/debates">debates</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/hot_debates">Hot Debates</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/minors">minors</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/molest">molest</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/murderers">murderers</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tag/rape">rape</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/rapists">rapists</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tag/teens">teens</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tags/therapy">therapy</category>
 <category domain="http://bloggerparty.com/tag/women">Women</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:15:08 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
