stay-at home moms.....contributors or leaches to society?

family | opinion piece | parenting | Psychology

I’m a mom (full time) and proud of it. Do I love staying at home with my kids???? Not always. Would I like to go back to work and earn money???? Hell yeah!!! But I won’t ….not at least until my kids are in school full time.
Although I’m a modern day educated women, I still believe that if you choose to have kids then you should be the one to raise them. Staying at home with your children is one of the hardest jobs out there and it is not even recognised as a real job, simply because it is not “paying�. In reality, the stay at home parent is juggling a variety of jobs…..nurse, teacher, cook, cleaner, chauffeur, financial planner; just to name a few. One study showed that if mothers were to be renumerated for their work around the home their salary would be approximately $150,000 US a year! But, alas, aside from isolation, loneliness and being stereotyped as a soap opera watching , bonbon eating , non-contributor to society, we get nothing. Are you aware that stay-at-home mom’s are classified as one of the most impoverished groups in Western society? How ironic is that??? Being financially punished for choosing to raise our children!!! People will counter this argument by saying ‘It is your choice to stay home�, but when did raising children start becoming a choice and stop being a duty. Children do not raise themselves, therefore someone has to raise them. Somewhere between the liberation of women in the 70’s and the working women of the 80’s, someone discovered that it is a lot easier to drop your kids off at some form of public institution, otherwise known as day-care, and they will be fine as long as you remember to pick them up on the way home from work. Hell, the day-care workers will even raise your kids for you!!! Note to readers: I hope you like your day-care worker as well as their sense of morality and value system because they will be the number one example in your child’s life during these crucial formative years in their development of self. These workers are being payed to be your child’s mother during the hours that you are unavailable and as a result are having a greater impact on their life than you and your partner combined.
I often ask working mom’s or mom’s considering going back to work, “If you had a brand new expensive Mercedes would you drop it off at the garage at 7:45 AM let various people drive it around all day and then pick it up at 5PM just to park it in your driveway?� After people look at me like I’m crazy and say “Of course not�, I ask them “If you wouldn’t do that with your car why would you even consider doing that to your child?�

What do you think???? Are SAHM' leeches or contributors to society???

Stay tuned for “Why women are returning to work and the effect it is having on society� and “Ways to be able to afford to stay at home with your children�

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tottie's picture

Definitely not leeches!

I admire you for what you are doing - I do believe more Mums should spend more time with their children. It is a quandary for careeroritented mothers in particular - they've worked so hard and without continuous service/experience, they get left out a bit when they return. It is a hard choice for mothers, but those that choose to stay at home should not be critisized.

o ceallaigh's picture

There's a question?!?

Show me the child of five and I'll show you the adult. What in pluperfect hell is more important than setting that child up during those formative years for the rest of that child's life? How many studies do we need to demonstrate that an unstable home life at those ages puts that person at major risk of falling into asocial / antisocial behaviors later? I am very uncomfortable with double-income households with small children and no "extended family" network in place (as in, say, Nigeria, where both parents typically work and the grandparents raise the children). And you may call me any flavor of pig you like for thinking so. In the American "nuclear family" model, the SAHP [NB] is the MVP on the team.

stay at home parents

Being a stay at home mom is the most important job in the world. It's the hardest job I've ever had to do, and boy do I feel like I should be fired half the time. I do understand that some women MUST work, though, or that some women are just not good at being stay at home moms (sometimes I wonder if I'm one of them...) I mean, would you rather a woman stay home who hated it and simply wasn't a very good role model because of it? Nah. Because if she'd rather work outside the home and the hours she DOES spend with her children are good quality hours, then all the better.

I do feel saddened that becoming a stay at home parent is out of the norm and that staying at home is often looked down upon.

I love your metaphor about the Mercedes!

o ceallaigh's picture

The loneliness of the SAH[M/F]

some women are just not good at being stay at home moms (sometimes I wonder if I'm one of them...)

I rather doubt you're "one of them". The very fact you're worried about it is evidence against. But this is a well-known challenge of the "nuclear family" model: the parents are constantly flying the trapeze without a net, and without having flown before. Where "extended families" are in place, the naive parent has experienced backup. In the "nuclear family" system, we largely deny that backup. Unless we pay for it, of course :(. It's annoying.

extended families

I'd like to expand on your "nuclear family" vs "extended family" point. I've thought about this a lot, and I do agree that one of the big struggles in our society is that we have embraced this concept of the "nuclear family". Having a network of family and friends to help out is such an important thing, especially when it comes to raising children. In many other cultures, even where the women work, children are still looked after by relatives and family friends. No child is raised solely by their mother and father.

Go to any parenting forum and you'll see masses of the lonely stay at home moms. I'm one of them.

But what can ya do? How can you change years of a certain way of thinking?

o ceallaigh's picture

Have a look at New Zealand's Playcentre concept ...

here. New Zealand is, or was, justly famous for excellent in early childhood education. An important part of that was the "parent cooperative" that provided education from about 2 to the 5th birthday (when formal education starts if the child is ready). Not only did this provide for the kids, but it helped build "the village" for the parents. Our children were raised in it, it was great.

Of course, New Zealand in the 80s still very much valued the SAHM. This support was eroding in the early 90s under economic pressures. Which is when we left the country, so I don't know what the last decade's history has been. Still, Playcentre and the ethic on which is based does illustrate what can be accomplished in the way of getting parents of pre-school children together for mutual support.

Thought-provoking...

I work outside the home for a few hours two days a week to make ends meet. My son is cared for by my parents in my absence. The rest of the time I work from home as a writer when he is sleeping (or being babysat on occasion by the TV, I'll admit it).

The days I go to work are the easy days. While moms who return to work have their own challenges, I think the rigors of staying a home, day in and day out, are really difficult.

My husband and I were married 9 years before we had a child because we felt it was super important to raise him or her ourselves vs. taking the child to daycare. We have friends and relatives that have made other choices because they have different beliefs. It's hard not to criticize their decisions, but since I haven't walked in their shoes, I really shouldn't judge.

I'm very fortunate to avoid loneliness (I'm a very social person) in my stay-at-home life by: going to the free library storytimes, where I met other moms with whom I socialize. I would really be miserable without them; by spending time with my parents, who live nearby. I chose to stay in this area (making sacrifices in potential earnings) because I value their company and their presence in my life; and by using the Internet.

Thanks again for this thought-provoking post. I expected something different when I read the title!

Should toddlers say butt and crap? Weigh in on the subject here.

Brenna
Blog at Writing UP!
Brenna Fender's Blog

We need to create a society that does not require two wages

and we need to place the raising of our children as a priority. And to raise the profile of this maligned role.

I cannot blame working mums.

From The Wig

amyrebba's picture

Boy is that right!

You know I stongly believe that everything in life happens for a reason. I thought when I first got pregnant with our third child that she was an oops. I was a career woman, moving up in the career of corporate sales and loving every minute of it. I drove a nice, old but gorgeous and refinished TransAm! I made decent money and enjoyed my time at work. I droped my two boys off at daycare every morning. I was very picky with my daycares, though. You are right they are the number one influence in your childs life. I always looked long and hard at who I left my children with. It often amazed me at the kind of care people left their children in when I would have to start the hunt for a daycare again. But when Jamie came along she changed all of that. It's like God sent her to me to wake me up to what my reponsiblity was as a mother. I quit work more out of a financial decision then the desire to be at home. I had always planned to be the career woman, not a stay at home mom. Nothing wrong with stay at home moms, I always admired them, just didn't think I was SAHM material. It was hard at first but I quickly saw that my middle boy's attitude started to improve. I had better control of him. The oldest was happier and the baby now has grown up with out that feeling of abandonment that her brother always felt every morning.

It sure wasn't easy to go from two incomes and two children to one income with three children. I barely pay the mortgage and the bill collectors are calling, but my children are so much happier and better behaved. It's just so hard with the cost of living these days to do that. We have created a society that almost requires you to have fewer children and two incomes. I don't know that there is a way to turn back the hands of time, but if we don't each generation is only going to get worse. As it is a great percentage are in the juvinel system, they have no respect for adults, and over all are in trouble.

I could go on an on about this. This was a great post.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.