Revelations at my sister's graduation, and why the war was completely necessary.

Submitted by IntricateGirl on August 24, 2006 - 8:54am.

Posted in gas | humanity | oil | violence | war | IntricateGirl | delicious | digg | reddit | 348 reads »

I went to my sister's graduation early this month. Because her class was a small one, they did the graduation a little differently than most I've been to. The school made no attempt to hide its religious affiliations, and the keynote speaker was a minister.

He told a story about how he was on a flight once, going to perform a relative's wedding. But after they landed, they had trouble even pulling up to the gate. See, that's when the whole eastern seaboard did not have electricity. Finally, they figured out how to get them off the plane, but they couldn't even open the doors to leave the airport. There were no lights, no way to retrieve their luggage, and all the other small things that are normally taken for granted were unavailable. He finally was able to leave, and another relative picked him up, but they discovered that they were low on gas. Guess what. Without electricity, there was no way to operate the pumps. They made it home by some miracle, but they were counting on the power being restored by the next morning. It wasn't. At that point, they gathered enough gas from neighbors who had it on hand to mow their lawns, and they were able to get to the wedding rehersal.

The point was, "Will you be prepared if you had to go off the grid?" It wasn't meant to be solely literal. The college was a health care school, and the point was that they had learned some bit of creativity that could serve them in times of trouble. Having seen my sister, I have some argument with that idea, but let's go with it.

And that's when it occurred to me. This is why we are in Iraq, and it is absolutely, without a doubt, necessary that we be there. It is absolutely necessary that people died for this.

At this point, anyone who has read any of my blogs is scratching their head in amazement. You're probably thinking, "Am I hearing right? What is that little liberal girl doing supporting the war?!?" And that's where you would be wrong. Don't mistake this for support. It's not support, it's acknowledgement.

This war was necessary because of the exact reason the preacher gave. He said he saw people throwing their cell phones against the ground because they would not work. Presumably, these are phones that would work again within a couple of days. The neighbors who they borrowed gas from all had places they needed to be. But they couldn't put it together that they needed to pool their resources.

In the movie War of the Worlds, even though I was disgusted at the story and the acting, one scene chilled me to my core. The family is in a van because they replaced a part after the electricity went down. In other words, they had the only working vehicle, and they had a better chance of escape. The first time they met a crowd of people, they were forced from the van at gunpoint. People were murdered and the van was crashed. It chilled me because if there were such a crisis, that is exactly what would have happened.

See, this whole time, I was confident in my ability to keep my family safe. I could afford to be elitist about it because I knew how to grow my own food and live without certain things we take for granted. But I forgot the human factor. If I have it, that doesn't mean I get to keep it. We've all heard that in the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. That's not true. He's held down and blinded. Read your Ray Bradbury.

So what now? Someone give me hope. Quickly.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
August 24, 2006 - 12:37pm

if there were such a crisis,

o ceallaigh's picture
o ceallaigh Says:

if there were such a crisis, that is exactly what would have happened.

Sounds to me like you've read not only your Bradbury but your Golding.

The only answer is preparation. Not only for yourself but for society at large. Throw a group of people into a calamity with no instructions, no discipline, no experience with the situation, and this is what is likely to result. The one-eyed man need not be blinded, if he knows how to control the crowds. And if the crowds are educated beforehand to value sight.

Unfortunately that requires sacrifice. Of time, money, liberty. We'd rather party. Until it's too late.


August 24, 2006 - 2:50pm

Ah! How could I forget that

IntricateGirl's picture
IntricateGirl Says:

Ah! How could I forget that one???

Therein lies the problem. People are not prepared to be prepared. Look at modern history. Those who are in charge are those who can inspire the most panic. Maybe it's not just modern history. Maybe this is the way it's always been.

Regardless, if people are partying, if it requires sacrifice that people are not giving, and if they refuse to be educated beforehand, does this change the situation at all? People are still completely lost when a problem strikes, and I doubt their ability to pull it together quickly enough when such problems happen. Wait until a snowstorm is predicted this winter and watch your neighbors. The lines will be long because everyone wants to have water on-hand. And yet they never bother to keep it on-hand regardless of the forecast.

Make Money blogging! http://www.buzzbyblog.com


August 24, 2006 - 3:14pm

You forget FDR

o ceallaigh's picture
o ceallaigh Says:

Of course, Franklin Roosevelt was largely dealing with a "close the door after the horse had bolted" situation, becoming President while the Great Depression was in full press. But he was one that guided people to concerted action, sometimes wise, sometimes less so, especially through the agency of his radio broadcasts (Fireside Chats). Imagine if a President today had the eyes of the people the way Roosevelt had the ears.

But then, Roosevelt was thoroughly hated by the moneylenders and business moguls, even though he was, by birth and upbringing, "one of them". But he made them contribute to society at large. None of this "trickle-down" supply-side economics that made Herbert Hoover one of the most reviled Presidents in our history - despite the fact that he made his name as one of the most accomplished charitable-relief technocrats in our history. They had to pay taxes.

If only we had an FDR to pick up the pieces after GW Hoov... sorry, Bush.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.