I recently read an essay by Vlaimir Nabokov (yes, the one of Lolita fame) called Good Readers and Good Writers. In it, he talks about what it is to be a good reader and what we do and should think about writers.
I could write about this essay for days on end, but one quote struck me in particular:
"Curiously enough, one cannot read a book: one can only reread it. A good reader, a major reader, an active and creative reader is a rereader."
I will give him credit for being clear that he is speaking only of a major and active reader, but whether he qualifies the statement or not, I agree. I don't think any of us can truly understand and appreciate the nuances of great, or even good literature without reading and rereading.
I wrote before about what it is to be a writer. . Before any of us can truly be a writer, then don't we need to be truly good readers? If we are to be good readers, then it is important that we know what that means. Nabokov takes us on that quest, and I am interested in the response.
What do you think is a good reader?
And what do you think is a good writer?
I'm interested, and as a writer of sorts here, maybe you should be too.





1 hour 19 min ago
3 hours 38 min ago
3 hours 47 min ago
7 hours 29 min ago
9 hours 43 min ago
9 hours 46 min ago
9 hours 47 min ago
9 hours 56 min ago
10 hours 30 min ago
22 hours 8 min ago