Prisoners Rewarded with... Video Games, TV's and Ice Cream?

Submitted by myspaceoryours on March 18, 2006 - 10:17am.

This story caught my attention because I'm originally from Oregon. But as I read the whole story, I couldn't quite believe what I was reading...

The Two Rivers Correctional Instition in Umatilla offers the following incentives to prisoners:

After 6 months of good behavior prisoners can:
*Purchase a $300 flat-screen TV for their bunk (these TV's can be hooked up with cable).
*Purchase CD players and music.

After 18 months of good behavior prisoners can:
*Purchase a video game console, preloaded with 50 video games.
*Go to hobby shops.
*Attend cell-block ice cream socials.

Hmmm... makes going to prison sound kind of fun doesn't it? Where else does 6 months of good behavior mean getting your very own flat-screen TV?!?

One of the prisoners enjoying these rewards is Kodi Dodgin, 23. Kodis says about his favorite video game Star Ally, "You get all these weapons and you've got to beat the four boss men. You kill your enemies. They let off these bubbles sometimes. You collect their bubbles, and you get all these weapons."

Just what you want prisoners thinking about, right? Weapons and more killing. By the way, Kodi is serving 9 years for assault, attempted escape and other crimes.

Randy Geer, adminstrator of the Department of Corrections' non-cash incentives program claims that assaults on staff and inmate fights have declined SLIGHTLY in the last 3 years. But is SLIGHTLY good enough?

No other state but Oregon offers video games to its prisoners, but Geer states that the prisoners are "human beings" who "need variety."

I agree with the fact about them being human beings. But they're human beings who messed up... BIG and quite possibly affected someone else's life in a terrible way forever. If they wanted variety, they should've thought about that BEFORE committing their crimes.

But that's just my opinion. What's yours?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
realitycheck's picture
realitycheck Says:
March 18, 2006 - 2:29pm

I think I love everything you write. This is a great topic. I did an article about the Death Penalty :
http://bloggerparty.com/the_death_penalty_for_it_or_against_it

and one fact in it is that it cost over $25,000 to house an inmate for a SINGLE YEAR!!!!

I have mentioned this before in my Legalize Marijuana blog -
My aunt was brutally murdered by a guy who wanted five fucking dollars to purchase drugs. He stabbed her in the chest 17 times. The only thing missing from her home was the twenty dollar bill she had in her purse. The most messed up thing was that if he just woulda asked she would have given it to him AND probably made him a glass of hot cocoa. That's the kind of woman she was.
Anyways, so this guy is in jail where he has access to fitness equipment, A SWIMMING POOL, skilled trade classes, flat screen tv's and more. Ya know what, I don't have a damn swimming pool I don't have a flat screen. I had to pay lots of money for my college education.
This is not fair. It's not right.
While my family mourns the loss of my fathers only sister some jerk off is enjoying watching movies.


myspaceoryours's picture
myspaceoryours Says:
March 18, 2006 - 3:40pm

It's a huge problem and I understand that it's not going to be solved in a day -- but something needs to be done. How can we be rewarding criminals with things that most of us don't even have?

That's a terrible thing about your aunt... the thing about crime is that it doesn't just affect the criminal and their victim, but all those connected to the criminal AND the victim. People don't think about how their actions are going to affect everyone around them... it's sad.

And thank you for that huge compliment! I feel the same about your blogs! :)


Blogalicious by Bexx
MySpace or Yours


pchan33's picture
pchan33 Says:
March 18, 2006 - 4:00pm

It does seem like prisoners get a lot of luxuries...but being in jail also means the possibility of getting raped by a larger inmate. prisoners also have access to free-weights and other excercise equipment. (gee, let's build a stronger criminal!)

Dreams Matter.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/6562/pchan_stockton.html


myspaceoryours's picture
myspaceoryours Says:
March 18, 2006 - 4:08pm

I suppose if I were locked up I'd prefer video games over prison rape too...

Still, the whole concept of rewarding criminals is lost on me...

Blogalicious by Bexx
MySpace or Yours


realitycheck's picture
realitycheck Says:
March 18, 2006 - 4:19pm

I hate to be bitter over my aunts situation, but I am. I think this is why I sooooo support the death penalty. Like I said, it is unfair that murders, rapists and people who molest children are allowed to "have fun" of any kind. They destroyed lives, I feel that theirs should be destroyed in return. Ya know, this is kinda like that one blog I wrote about parentas spanking their kids. I put something in it about, "Sending your kids to their room so they can watch tv is NOT a punishment. Taking away your childs Ipod for a day is NOT a punishment..." hmmmm. If we can punish our children who have committed minor offenses, why can't we punish a 33 year old male who take the life of an innocent elderly woman over a five dollar bill?

I just watched this thing two nights ago on tv. It was about victims confronting the killer. A statistic said that if a murder/rapist has a one-on-one with the victim/victims family they are less likely to commit a second offense. If that is the best we can do to stop repeat offenders we have serious issues. As much as I would like to say that I would confront this man, I think I would probably do something I'd regret. The show just made me think a lot. You are right, people who comit these crimes truly have no idea of the ripple effect that they will cause. My seven month old will never get a chance to have his Great Aunt Dorthy attend his first birthday party. Sad.


o ceallaigh's picture
o ceallaigh Says:
March 18, 2006 - 6:15pm

So what are we going to do with prisoners? Who are in prisons that are massively overpopulated, with zero chance of getting political permission and funding from We the People for new facilities? Prisons that are understaffed with people far less well paid than the risks of the job warrant (see "political permission and funding", above)?

Put the prisoners to work? That seems obvious. Let them work off their debt to society. Breaking rocks. Chain gangs on the roads. Useful trades that might break the cycle of poverty and violence. That might, especially for first offenders, prevent the "crime" career choice from becoming fixed?

No way. We the People decided that was cruel and unusual. We the People decided that the costs of security for work parties was too high. We the People decided that having criminals learn useful trades was taking jobs away from the undetected criminals in our midst. (Read the criminal codes sometime. We are all crooks. We've all busted some law someplace.) What do we allow the convicts to do? Make license plates. Build ships in bottles. Try making a living on the outside with that, M. Jean ValJean.

Shall we let them sit on their behinds and rot like the scum that we think they are? As if they'll sit there. Idleness is famously the breeding ground of vice. Idleness promotes prison gangs. Vice rings. Guard murders. Riots. And it sure as hell cements the "crime" career choice in place.

Shall we judicially murder them? We can't find a way to do that which addresses all our sensitivities. Ask Arnie here in California. Besides, see Gandalf.

Shall we try to address the social problems that breed the crime? Ain't happening here in Berkeley, where the divide between rich and poor, white and black, is at least as large as it's ever been. "Progressive liberals" my fat ass.

Ask any kindergarten teacher how to settle a class. You plunk them in front of a TV. The mental activity dwindles down almost to the level of sleep. It's as good as a drug to somnulate the prison population. A wide-screen TV is one hell of a lot cheaper than constant lockdowns. And more effective for all but the most hardened cases. And you can concentrate scarce resources on the hardened cases if you can camp the rest in front of NCAA Basketball or video games and know they are (relatively) secure.

It is easy to criticize from the outside. I've done enough things to realize that direct knowledge makes a lot of criticism look, well, uncritical. I have (thank God) never been in prison, or knowingly given cause to wind up in one. But I am not prepared to whack those in prison (as inmates, guards or administrators) until I have shared a cell block with them.

None of this will help how you feel about your great aunt, Reality. The feeling is universal. It is why the Hebrews coded "an eye for an eye" into their Law. To be sure that vengeance took ONLY an eye for an eye, instead of an eye and an ear and a hand as was usual before the Torah came into being - a progression that has obvious, and frightful, consequences.

Oh - and it's written somewhere, I forget where, that the greatest deterrents to crime are the prospect of being seen while doing it, and of facing the victims after it's done. There have been, if I remember rightly, some halting steps in addition to the one you mention to put this principle into practice. Maybe someone could do some research ...


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.