o ceallaigh's picture

Penicillin, The Scourge of Humanity

An Inconvenient Truth | Health | medicine | O Ceallaigh: Science Belief and Society | population bomb

Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth left no stone unturned, no receding glacier unphotographed, no graph unanimated, to point its moral: carbon dioxide generated by humans begets global warming.

Except one.

The human population curve.

Yes, he showed one. But while he was absolutely eager to show how Africa and South America fit together, how graphs of carbon dioxide levels and temperatures fit together, how graphs of temperatures and sea levels fit together, he did not do anything with the population curve. Two seconds and it was gone. But to anyone paying attention, anyone still awake after listening to Al Gore for an hour and a half, the perfect fit of the population curve with all the rest ought to have been a knock-you-off-your-seat.

Y’see, carbon dioxide has been building in the atmosphere ever since the Industrial Revolution started using fossil fuels to fire boilers in locomotives and ships, starting around 1850 as coal progressively replaced wood. But the curve really starts taking off in the 1940s. Which just happens to be when penicillin, the first of the true “miracle drugs�, entered the market in a big way.

Damn that Fleming and his flippin’ Petri dishes.

In 1940, Earth’s human population stood at about two billion, following 10,000 years of slow, steady increase. The 50 million lives lost as a result of World War II hardly made a dent, as has been the case with other instances of war, famine and pestilence throughout history.

During that whole period, disease took a horrible toll. At the start of the twentieth century, 1 in 200 women died from complications related to childbirth, even in “advanced� countries like the United States. Half of all children born died in infancy, usually from infectious diseases. Edward Bates, Abraham Lincoln’s first Attorney General and a candidate for President in 1860, had 17 children with his wife Julia. No, my fingers didn’t slip on the keyboard. That’s 17. Seventeen. The Bates mansion teemed with a large and active family. All nine of them. The nine that survived the microbial perils of infancy and youth. That ratio of infant survival was about normal for the time.

It wasn’t any picnic for adults either. Smallpox. Influenza. Typhoid fever. Malaria. Tuberculosis. Scarlet fever. Poliomyelitis. Any one of a hundred others. Any one of which could bite you at any time, and the physicians of the day could only hope that the mercury they dosed you with would kill the complaint before it killed you.

With penicillin, and the host of antibiotics and vaccines and other drugs that actually worked which stormed in on penicillin’s heels, all that changed.

Say you have mice, and plenty of food for the mice. But there are also plenty of cats. The cats keep the population of the mice low. Now take away the cats. The population of the mice will explode. Until all the food is gone. The resulting population growth curve will look almost exactly like that of the human population since the 1940s.

Almost … because the human rate of population growth is greater than that which has been measured for any other species that has experienced “release from predation� – like those mice from the cats. Perhaps that’s because the other measurements focused on one predator species per prey. Bacteria and viruses have been the principal human predators – and, with penicillin and its ilk, we wiped out hundreds of different predators almost simultaneously.

Used to be, if a child died as an infant, the loss was mourned but accepted. Part of the natural order. Happens to everybody. God’s will and all that. Now, if a baby dies, somebody’s ass is going to get sued. A fetus is born the size of a marble, with gills and a tail, and two years later the “human interest� section of the evening news shows a bouncing, healthy toddler. Did I say “healthy�? What about those fourteen allergies and metabolic deficiencies that they’re not telling you about? And the story’s right after the one documenting this year’s twenty percent rise in health insurance rates.

I swear, taking a twentysomething out to dinner these past ten years has been a challenge. Seems like every one’s got an allergy, a sensitivity, a chronic bowel or nervous complaint, for which they need to take $200 dollars worth of pills a month, and carefully manage their diet. Whatever the restaurant or the menu, there’s something I like that they can’t have. Before 1940, I wouldn’t be seeing these folk – they are the ones who would have contracted an infection, or been terminally weakened by their metabolic deficiencies, and passed to their reward by age 1.

Gone are the days when Bill Cosby could accuse his father of saying “You behave. 'Cause if you don’t, I’ll kill you. And it won’t matter, ‘cause I’ll make another one looks just like you.� Oho – so that’s why those Popes have been so uptight about The Pill all these years ...

All those people. Nearly 5 billion new ones in just 60 years. And they all want heat, and air conditioning, and trash disposal, and the medicines for what ails them, not to mention the right to burn their autumn leaves in their yards. And they’re all listening to politicians promising them a chicken in every pot and two SUVs in every garage …

And the scientists saw it coming.

Al Gore lionized the oceanographer (yahoo!) Roger Revelle, who, in 1957, co-wrote the first scientific paper predicting global warming as a result of fossil fuel consumption. Ironically, a colleague of mine sailed recently on the R/V Roger Revelle, investigating a phenomenon that may explain why global warming is actually happening not quite as fast as Revelle and his partners/successors predicted.

But Gore said not one word about the scientist who pointed a finger at the principal factor inducing all that fossil fuel burning. The growth of human population.

Paul R. Ehrlich.

Unfortunately, Ehrlich’s seminal book, The Population Bomb, focused on the consequences of human population growth on its food supply. After all, starvation is the most likely outcome for those cat-less mice. He did not count on technology, a tool not available to mice.

At least temporarily, humans have kept food production ahead of population growth, have kept medical science ahead of most disease microbes (though the African AIDS situation should oughta be a reminder of how precariously we are poised at the divide between health and catastrophic global pandemic).

All of this activity, though, needs energy. And that means, at present, fossil fuels. And carbon dioxide, and … and …

If, as seems practically certain, human fossil fuel burning is responsible for global warming, and human population growth is a major contributor to that fossil fuel burning, then Viagra ought to be condemned as a crime against humanity.

Why didn’t Gore make this case? Guess he didn’t want to have to face the anti-abortion lobby. Again. Speaking of crimes against humanity …

I once made a couple of old ladies on a plane very mad at me by saying, “Penicillin is the worst thing ever to happen to humankind.�

That was twenty years ago.

Some things do remain the same.

   - O Ceallaigh

Copyright © 2006 Felloffatruck Publications. All wrongs deplored.

All opinions are mine as a private citizen.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
IntricateGirl's picture

And to prove a point you made yesterday...

the hypocrisy is mine.

I sit here and yell a "Right on!" at my computer, and then I'll feed the kids, get them into the car, and drive to my doctor, where later this afternoon, he will prescribe my daughter some antibiotics to clear up the infection she has in her nose. Because your words couldn't possibly apply to me.

I mean, after all, I know that I'm supposed to finish the entire course of drugs so that we don't leave behind a really resistant bit of nastiness that makes her and everyone else very sick. And I know that the doctor who will see her is very responsible and knowledgeable, and if he says there will be no antibiotics, he knows what he's talking about. And I know that it would have been better to prevent it in the first place, rather than treating it afterwards.

But it doesn't matter. It's my daughter, and therefore, it's personal. God's will is irrelevant, because God gave us penicillin to treat her. And it's what any good parent would do. So those irresponsible people who demand antibiotics at inappropriate times, or use them improperly can stop. I'm responsible and my daughter is ill, so therefore I deserve to use them. Properly. It's personal. It's individual. And if I don't treat her, I have to deal with the results.

A lot of people wonder why I have written off any hope for humanity. Because it's always personal. And no, this isn't a "shame on you for writing this." It's more like a "we are all screwed."

o ceallaigh's picture

Actually, we aren't all screwed, Intricate ...

... but we don't seem to be able to think things through. If we're going to have penicillin, so we can cherish our children, we need to take into consideration our overall reproductive rates so that we don't eat ourselves out of house and home.

We need to think really seriously about new technologies that permit us to assess the health of the unborn, and to make what many would consider devastating choices for our own good and that of our neighbors.

We need to think really seriously about whether childbearing is a right, or (as in the rest of nature) a privilege of the most fit (which, in the current state of the human condition, mostly means "wealthy"). I find myself wishing I were a father again, but that emotional side has to face my rational side, which announces that it's irresponsible for me to consider fathering a child without a million dollars in liquid assets available to me. Not to mention other reasons. Like, no candidate mothers :).

And yes, this is all part and parcel of my long-term "it's in the mirror" message. Everyone wants to cut taxes, but no one wants to lose any of the services those taxes provide. Lots of people are worried about global warming, but when it comes time to consider the actions needed to reduce carbon dioxide, "no, not me." If that doesn't change, well, then we really will be screwed.

The fact that we're all still here suggests to me that we have eventually decided to do enough of the right things when called upon. I can only trust that this trend will continue.

IntricateGirl's picture

So I repeat. We're screwed.

So I repeat. We're screwed. I look at places like Darfur and Rwanda and wonder how that happened. We've lost our global mind.

I had one friend that swore she would never have kids. Furthermore, she did it for all the right reasons, such as population growth. And even beyond that, she lived her life with the responsibility it takes to really make a decision like that. She decided that if she ever wanted kids, she would adopt. Now she's getting older, it's becoming more difficult to have one, but she's in a relationship with a guy that likes kids, and she finally feels the emotional desire to have a child. And all I could think is, "Damn! There goes my last noble friend." lol

I hope you're right. I really do. If I can't find hope in this situation, I can at least hope that others will continue to find it.

o ceallaigh's picture

You're making me look like an optimist

After all, one kid is below replacement level. Two, technically, is also. And it's the persons with some smarts whom you want to have kids. Not some of the ones who actually are these days.

The Darfurs and Rwandas are what Paul R. Ehrlich expected to have on a global rather than a local level. Both places have experienced population growth combined with climate change and other factors that put the squeeze on food and other local resources. Epidemics (i.e., in this case, AIDS) are well known to occur most often, and with the greatest devastation, where people are crowded and their resources (especially nutritional) are limited.

Basically, we all have to be more, and more truly, educated, and more willing to make sacrifices in order to sustain ourselves in the days to come. Yes, I said that means more money for the public schools. Like, on the order of double.

Maybe you're right after all ...

IntricateGirl's picture

I apologize for your

I apologize for your optimism. :D

Certainly such events are to be expected. At least from a sociologist's perspective. Outside it's always shock and dismay, and everyone asking how it could happen.

ugh. I'm back from the doctor's office, and if my daughter doesn't pull it together, I'm going to have to go the Bill Cosby route and make a replacement for her. A year and a half ago, she stuck a doll shoe in her nose. I took her to the ER, and the doctor told us that he couldn't see it, and it probably worked its way around and passed. First of all, with my crackerjack box medical license, this isn't the first thing she's stuck in her nose. I know from the first SURGEON who worked on her just how far she'd have to cram it in for it to work its way back. And her fingers aren't long enough or bendy enough. And despite my protestations that the shoe is the exact same color as the lining of her nose, he assured me that he suckered someone into giving him a job as a doctor, so he must know what he's talking about. Second, this same damn quack told me I didn't have tonsillitis when I know that I did. So he's completely lost my faith.

Fortunately, my older Chinese doctor was there, and we saw him today. He looked at it, thought it was a piece of corn, thought about the instruments he'd need to use, and tried to get it. It was too far back and too stuck, and he started talking about having to put her under. He decided to take one more peek and see how deep it was, even if he couldn't get it. Sure enough, it was the damn doll shoe.

A child that uses their nose like I use my pockets makes me question my own genes. God help us all, 'cause if she makes it into adulthood, there's something wrong with this one. ;)

Edited to remove some really impressive run-on sentences.

o ceallaigh's picture

No apology needed

But look on the bright side. With that willingness to experiment on herself, your daughter could wind up a GREAT scientist. You heard it here first.

Stick with the Chinese guy.

Dig deep enough, there's something wrong with all of us. But I'll thank you to keep your probes out of my sinuses.

:)

IntricateGirl's picture

Great.

I remember the story of Madame Curie. It didn't end so well. Besides, she would just discover the next great thing to keep us alive well past our prime.

I love the Chinese guy. He almost sounds fictional, he's so perfect. He never keeps us waiting, always has the correct diagnosis, explains things in depth without going too in depth. He's excellent.

I'm not probing ANYONE's sinuses. But watch out for my daughter. She's quick and inquisitive. eek.

missmaster's picture

It's natural selection gone wrong...

As you described O'C, the normal evolutionary order of things, of nature, keeps the population under control. Well, of every living thing except humans.

Since our meddling began, we have tampered with the natural order, nature's control. Prolonging our lives and fighting illnesses. Nature has lost control over us. So what happens now? What is left to keep the population in check?

Enter the superbug. And climate change. AIDS, famine, poverty, natural disasters, weather extremes.

Nature is slowly but surely fighting back. We have destroyed her way and now we must pay.

All these 'great things' we have done for our race: vaccines, pills and the like, they have all given us many benefits. But it has tipped the balance too much in our favour. And balance is the law of nature. So nature is finding its way back to just that: a balance.

And I believe it is too late to do much about it now. Pessimistic?

Consider one aspect:

We've all heard of global warming right? The effect of pollution on the ozone layer? Well have you heard of global cooling?

Global cooling is the effect of all that pollution sitting up there in the atmosphere. What it does is protect the earth from a lot of the radiation coming from space and the sun. Funny huh? Because the ozone layer is now so thin and doesn't offer that much protection on its own, all our pollution is now kind of doing its job. But its still doing its bit to break down the ozone layer even more.

Catch 22.

Stop polluting and the planet overheats due to the loss of this cooling effect.

Do nothing about pollution and we suffer the same ill fate.

There's little to do about this now. It's already started.

And if that doesn't wipe out half the human population, then Nibiru's passing, causing a polar shift, will.

I just hope after it all happens that I'm still here to give my daughter some semblance of a life.

And respect for nature.

Need A Reliable Freelancer?

ms zola's picture

In the scheme of billions

of years does any of it really matter anyway? Doll shoe et all? our fragile little lives and that of everything else living on this god forsaken dog eat dog planet will pass unnoticed as one epoch slides into another.

o ceallaigh's picture

Neither too late nor unimportant

If I really thought it was too late, missmaster, I would never have posted this blog. I'd be out getting, er, dates.

In fact, the global warming/cooling cycles are driven by factors far more complex than just carbon dioxide or "pollution". In fact, one contributor to global cooling, via cloud formation, is produced by algae in the sea and is likely to increase more or less in parallel with global warming, putting a check on the latter. Another "cooling" phenomenon is linked to the rate and volume of volcanic eruptions. Also independent on humans. We simply don't have enough smart people working on all these issues to say which will effect the other, never mind how much and what that will mean for the sea level at Gibraltar Harbor (shouldn't that be "Harbour"?) next week.

There is also some evidence that world action on chlorofluorocarbon emissions has arrested the ozone hole phenomenon. Which we still don't really understand very well, because we have precious few records before somebody noticed that the hole had opened. It's perhaps unlikely, but still possible, that such holes have been a cyclically-recurring phenomenon in Earth history.

I would lose not a millisecond of sleep over Nibiru.

The best way to give your daughter, and anyone else's, a "semblance of a life" is to remain as determined as possible, and to refuse to let either the wishful thinkers or the doomsayers have the floor.

Frodo: "I wish the ring had never come to me. I wish none of this had happened."
Gandalf: "So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us. There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil."

ms. zola - see immediately above.

missmaster's picture

Well it depends which side of the...

..Atlantic you live on doesn't it? hehe

Harbour, harbor.

Tomayto, Tomahto.

Potayto, Potahto.

Whatever.

I think when I posted that comment I was 'doomsday biased'. I was exceedingly irritated with everything at the time and furiously hammered my keys with the end result of a 'the end is nigh' type response!

I'd agree with you that there is a lot we still don't understand, on both sides of the coin.

But I reckon we've all got a fair understanding of the fact that we are probably far more destructive and ignorant of nature's way now than at any other time in human history.

Kinda depressing.

Hopefully an age of understanding and harmony with nature is dawning.

And what I've been reading, that could be sooner than expected!

See Bionic Buildings on BBC World (or search net if you don't get that) for a brief but intriguing glimpse of the future.

Need A Reliable Freelancer?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.