I wanted to generate some discussion on an idea I had a few months ago, and I require a more intelligent audience to progress the understanding as to whether I am on to something or not.

Bear with me...

Global warming has created much debate as of late. The argument is that the temperature of the earth is being increased slowly by "greenhouse gases." This may or may not be happening, I am unsure. But the argument is made that use of certain products or the destruction of them "erodes" the "Ozone." This is another argument altogether.

What I would like to add to that discussion are the effects "Native Earth Matter Expulsion" has on:

A. The gravitational strength of the Earth
B. The gravitational force the Earth is exercising on the moon
C. The Earth's Magnetic Field
D. Global Warming/Cooling
E. The Ozone

By "Native Earth Matter Expulsion," I mean the blasting of any material that originates on this planet out side the Earth's gravitational pull or its' magnetic field. this includes all rockets, satellites, spacecraft, space stations, deep space probes and any and all fuels and materials that have not or will not return to the earth.

A few points that will matter for this discussion:

1. The Earth's Gravitational Strength is directly related to the matter and amount of that matter on the planet.

2. The Earth's magnetic field is directly related to the matter and amount of that matter on the planet.

3. The atmospheric pressure is higher at the surface of the Earth than at the outermost shell of our atmosphere.

4. All matter has density and volume, it takes up space.

5. The position of the Moon in relation to the Earth is directly related to the gravitational force the Earth exerts on the Moon.

Keeping all this in mind, does not the expulsion of matter indigenous to the Earth reduce the overall gravitational strength of the planet and its' magnetic field?

If either of these are altered does not the equilibrium between the Earth and Moon get thrown off balance?

Add to this the density of the matter we are sending into space.

For example a piece of steel. If steel were turned into its' gaseous state, the gas would require much more space. To illustrate this imagine the explosion that gun powder makes when it is ignited. The explosion is really just the force the gun powder exerts when changing from a solid to a gas state and acquiring the volume of space required for the newly released gas.

If somehow I were to transport you directly into space a void would be left in your space and a vacuum created as the atmosphere rushes into fill the void. At the same time, the outermost atmosphere is brought closer to the surface of the Earth and gravity is lost, allowing more atmospheric gases to dissipate into space.

Everything that is blasted into space is reducing our atmosphere, the earth's gravity, the earth's magnetic field and the equilibrium between the Earth and the Moon.

If the atmospheric gases are being reduced and dissipated then global warming or cooling would result. I am not sure which yet.

This would affect the weather, the tides, the Earth's temperature, the Aurora Borealis and the earth's ability to maintain an atmosphere.

In short I believe that sending matter native to the Earth into space is forever impacting and has far greater impacts that the currently accepted reasons for global warming.

Geminigma


Some believe we have as a population, gotten Amnesia when it comes to our origin.

Related: