Is It Love, Or Is It Fantasy?

deorre's picture
emotinal development | Fantasy | love

Love can consume a person, and in return, the person will savor love. A wonderful circle, really. Yet, how is it possible to distinguish love from fantasy? In song, the uncertainty surfaces:

… ‘every time I see I see you baby, I wonder, is it love or is it fantasy.’

The psychodynamic implications of this question lead directly to one branch of the object-relations theorists. These folks state that infants, as well as adults, have a rich fantasy life. In the emotional development from child to adult, the fantasies are not lost, but covered over by ego-based requirements of day-to- day, pragmatic life. The richness is still there. It is simply repressed.

Perhaps, the fantasy-based volcano that is repressed by the needs and requirements of ‘responsible, adult life’ erupts when something like ‘love’ tickles it. We call it love because that is romantic, desirable, and leads to wonderful things that provide pleasure as well as perpetuate the species.

Yet maybe it is all fantasy that is connected to the drama and intrigue of our infant mind. Perhaps we are all simply acting out the calamity of seeking the breast that once gave us both comfort and sustenance.

So tell me,

IS IT LOVE, OR IS IT FANTASY?

deorre

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tamiya's picture

Fantasy.. All that stuff

Fantasy..

All that stuff people think of about love is just a fantasy, real love is not hating someone after you know all the gross things about them!!

Maverick's picture

What was it...

A week ago internet love was true?

Tamiya's picture

internet love

I didn't say it WAS.. I was wondering if it was. And I was wrong!

deorre's picture

Not Hating the One You Love

True, true Tamiya. After you learn that the other has an issue with, er....massive flatulence, for instance. True love, platonic (?) love, is what guides through the stench.

This type of love is what emerges when one mindfully attends to the other person, and does not mindlessly act out their fantasy-based issues.

Thanks for the response!

deorre

deorre's picture

Internet Love

A difficult prospect, for sure. Hard to beat the real tangible stuff. It's also more emotionally risky--the tangible stuff.

deorre

Tamiya's picture

It's all emotional risky!

It's all emotional risky!

o ceallaigh's picture

It's chemistry

"Love" is how we verbalize a specific neurological cascade that prepares us to suspend our normal "to the death" guarding of our personal space for specific persons, usually for protection, comfort, copulation, or all of the above. Scientists don't understand the cascade very well, but they know it's there.

The problem is that we don't have a good handle on what triggers the cascade. Remember that, before the 19th century, we didn't have photographs or electric/electronic communications, so our opportunities to "fall in love" with someone (something) not close to us were limited.

Loneliness is also a neurological cascade, and it has its own problems. James Thurber once wrote of a peacock who had no peahens around. So he displayed his sexual readiness to a chicken hen, who ignored him. Finally in frustration, he left the hen alone and displayed to his water dish.

deorre's picture

Mystery of Love is Worth The Risk

Perhaps there is a mystery that will never be 'unriddled'. And, as Tamiya indicates, the risk will always be there. And, the reward so great in a random reinforcement sort of way, that it just goes on and on.

deorre

o ceallaigh's picture

You think so?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.