Grace Under Pressure

Submitted by manodogs on November 21, 2006 - 4:00pm.

Posted in Celebrity Gossip | CNN | court | entertainment | Legal | manodogs | nancy grace | politics | The Run Down | delicious | digg | reddit | 878 reads »

It appears that some people agree with my contention that those who contribute to a crime by influencing others are at least partially responsible.

The family of a woman who committed suicide after appearing on Nancy Grace's CNN talk show to discuss her missing son says she may have been influenced by Grace's harsh interrogation as to her whereabouts on the day her son disappeared. I'm inclined to agree.

For those who do not know, Nancy Grace is a know-it-all talk show hostess who was formerly a prosecutor. She abhors the idea of "innocent until proven guilty" and looks exactly like someone's holding a small turd beneath her nose at all times. She's been particularly picked on by TV shows lately, and apparently this is what sparked it.

I've personally seen Grace and her show and she can be very, very ugly. Aside from the fact that she is physically unattractive, I mean that her behavior is rude, aggressive, and often verges on the psychotic. Further, Nancy Grace is a confirmed liar whose entire professional reputation was exposed as being fraudulent by a New York reporter several months back.

According to Grace, she became a prosecutor after she and her fiance were attacked and he was murdered. The truth is far from that. In fact, the only truth to Grace's accounts of that event is that she was engaged to the victim; everything else is a complete fabrication.

Do I think Nancy Grace caused the woman to kill herself? I absolutely think she should bear some responsibility. The woman was in a very fragile state, was lured onto Grace's show under false pretenses, and was then verbally attacked and abused by the hostess. It was a case of undue stress that could have been overlooked, were it not for the way she was lured into the entire thing.

To my eyes, people who are in emotionally and/or psychologically shaky positions should be handled differently from the way others are handled, period. And failure to do so is irresponsible and cruel, but not criminal. Exerting undue influence -- in any fashion -- on such people should be punishable as a criminal action. And while that may open up the floor for every Tom, Dick, and Harry to use this as a defense, cases such as this one are pretty cut-and-dried.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
November 21, 2006 - 6:56pm

I agree, Manodogs.

wastedtime's picture
wastedtime Says:

The fact that this woman's child was missing should have been the only 'clue' needed for Nancy disGraceful to treat her with care. If the woman was responsible for the disappearance of the child, then she was unbalanced and should have been handled with kid-gloves just as a consideration for the safety of the people involved in the interview. People like Ms. disGraceful have been lucky, so far. So far, none of their victims have pulled out a gun and blown them away - or waited for them in a parking lot and repaid them for their interview techniques. But it's gonna happen. Some day, someone like Nancy disGraceful is gonna go too far with the wrong person.

Besides all that, it's time the press started behaving in a responsible manner. Most of them can only be called press in the broadest interpretation of the word, anyway. The kind of skewed interviews that Nancy disGraceful conducts are not responsible, they are not real news. They are nothing but sensationalist entertainment (I guess you can call it entertainment) geared to the shock and awe that attracts viewers. Just because something attracts viewers doesn't make it right. I'm sure a public disembowelment would attact viewers, too. Doesn't mean it should be done.


November 22, 2006 - 2:47pm

Very Well-Stated

manodogs's picture
manodogs Says:

I appreciate the well-written response, Wasted! I agree with you wholeheartedly and if you missed the whole Borat exchange, I'd love to have your thoughts on that as well. Intricate is a great blogger and I highly recommend everything she writes, though she and I rarely see eye-to-eye on most things... except horror movies. Hell, even then, she likes Cabin Fever. Eh, what's to be done?

Still, we both made good points and any reasonable addition to the discussion is always welcome. With the current state of information sharing being what it is, this is the best time to get our points in, because legalities are just around the corner.

- Manodogs


November 29, 2006 - 3:42pm

Still blame me for Jeffrey's win? :D

IntricateGirl's picture
IntricateGirl Says:

No, we may not see eye to eye, but it's a lot of fun arguing with you. lol!

I like Cabin Fever??? In what universe? I had to look up my exact words, and they were, "It would have been simpler, although a much shorter review, to say that the movie was excrement. :)" I stand by that comment too. :D


December 3, 2006 - 2:34pm

Donnie Darko!

manodogs's picture
manodogs Says:

That's right, that's right! It's Donnie Darko you like. Sorry, same director. You know, the rabbit's in Cabin Fever -- right toward the end, he's sitting on a gurney in the hospital as they rush dude to the ICU.

- Manodogs


December 3, 2006 - 2:54pm

Ok, you got me there.

IntricateGirl's picture
IntricateGirl Says:

Ok, you got me there. Still, it's not my favorite movie.

Ugh. That got me to thinking about my favorite movies, and I really need to see a few more chick flicks. Just today I was quoting lines from Fight Club. lol


November 21, 2006 - 10:04pm

Right.

multisubj Says:

--

November 22, 2006 - 2:51pm

In General...

manodogs's picture
manodogs Says:

I find such wordy, verbose responses nothing more than a waste of bandwidth, but with it being the holidays and all... I'll let it slide. This time.

- Manodogs


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.