We should at least rename the United Nations
We should reorganize or, at least, rename the United Nations. The name implies unity. With the hegemonic world we live in now and the fact that the most powerful nation, the United States, bypasses international law doesn’t it make having international law a moot point? How can the world abide by an organization and a set of global rules when the most powerful nation in the world doesn’t adhere to them? To the United States the U.N. is just a tool for its foreign policy. John Bolton, the under-Secretary of State for International Organizations, the linchpin of the State Department ties to U.N. affairs during the Reagan administration once said, “There is no United Nations. There is an international community that occasionally can be led by the only real power left in the world, and that is the United States, when it suits our interest, and when others to go along….. When the United States leads, the United Nations will follow. When it suits our interest to do so, we will do so. When it does not suit our interests we will not� This is a bold, but true, statement if looking at the United Sates and their recent dealings with the U.N. It didn’t suit the U.S. interests to sign the Kyoto Protocol, nor sign onto the World Court so they signed neither. The U.S. didn’t wait until international support for the invasion of Iraq, so they didn’t.





12 hours 12 min ago
12 hours 16 min ago
15 hours 1 min ago
16 hours 59 min ago
17 hours 1 min ago
17 hours 9 min ago
17 hours 12 min ago
17 hours 18 min ago
17 hours 23 min ago
17 hours 26 min ago