ANIMAL TESTING - Cruel and Unusual Punishment?

Submitted by realitycheck on April 7, 2006 - 6:41am.

Animal Testing – Cruel and Unusual Punishment?

Question: Which personal care, non-pharmaceutical products are required by law to be tested on animals?

Answer: None!

Yes, that's right. There is NO law that requires companies to test their personal care and household products on animals before selling them to consumers!

Each year about FIVE MILLION dogs, cats, rabbits, rats, monkeys, and other animals die in lethal dose tests performed in the U.S. During a lethal dose test, the expiremental substance is forced into the animals throats, or is pumped into their stomachs by a tube, sometimes causing death by stomach rupture or from the sheer bulk of the chemical dosage. Substances are mixed in lab chows, injected under the skin, into a vein, or into the lining of the abdomen, they are often applied to the eyes, rectum and vagina or forciblly inhaled through a gas mask. Expirementers observe the animal's reaction which include convulsions, laboured breathing, diarrhea, constipation, skin eruptions, abnormal posture, and bleeding from the eyes, nose or mouth. According to statistics, 50% of these animals will die in this expirement 2 to 3 weeks later.
The horrible fact about these incidents is that they are unneccesarry as there exists cheaper, efficient and more realistic results that can be used instead of animals.

AWFUL DEATHS
Late 2001 and 2002: death of three monkeys at University of Wisconsin-Madison

August 2003: death of a beagle at Pfizer Pharmaceutical
A beagle was scalded to death at Pfizer Pharmaceutical in Kalamazoo, Michigan when he was mistakenly sent through a cage-washing system and subjected to sanitizing liquid heated to 180 degrees. The U.S. Department of Agriculture looked into the dog's death and closed the investigation by issuing a warning that goes on the company's record. (Source: Wall Street Journal, March 30, 2004)

July 2004: death of three monkeys at University of Wisconsin-Madison
The director at the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center at the University of Wisconsin-Madison confirmed that three marmosets were killed from heat exposure after being left in a cage that was sent through a sanitizer. The Alliance for Animals filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Agriculture stating that the center needs to reassess its policies and procedures. (Sources: Associated Press, August 26, 2004)

TODAYS ALTERNATIVES:
* "Synthetic skin," called Corrositex
* Computer modeling
* Improved statistical design
* The Murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA)

DID YOU KNOW: Revlon Cosmetics was one of the first large companies to fund research for alternatives with a $750,000 contribution to the Rockefeller University in 1979.

HERE’S A LIST OF COMPANIES THAT DO NOT TEST ON ANIMALS: Abercrombie & Fitch, Almay, Avon, Bath & Body Works, Body Glove Skin & Hair Care, Bonne Bell, Chanel, Inc., Christian Dior, Clinique, Dep, Estee Lauder, Revlon, Gucci, Henri Bendel, Jean Nate, Jessica McClintock, Conair, Liz Claiborne, Nexxus, Pathmark Supermarkets , Prescriptives, Redken, Revlon, Rusk, Tom's of Maine, Trader Joe's, and Victoria's Secret*.
Want to purchase products that were not animal tested? http://www.veganmercantile.com

SIGN A PETITION AGAINST ANIMAL TESTING:
http://www.petitiononline.com/pawsclub/petition.html

Download the PDF Booklet: 42 Ways You Can Help Animals In Laboratories
http://www.hsus.org/animals_in_research/general_information_on_animal_research/42_ways_to_help_animals_in_laboratories/

SOURCES:
http://www.allforanimals.com/alternatives1.htm
http://www.geari.org/alternativestest.html

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Animal testing

#54744 On April 7, 2006 7:21am o ceallaigh said,
o ceallaigh's picture

Weighing in on this subject in defense of testing is rather like spraying the Flag, Mom, and Apple Pie with an AK-47 on full automatic and then stupidly hanging around to gloat over the damage while the police forces of seven states descend upon you.

Nevertheless, I find grim amusement in seeing on Day 1 a diatribe against animal testing, and on Day 2 an exposé of companies whose products have been found to be unsafe for human use. Caught between this Scylla and Charibdis, it's a wonder that companies make products at all. Maybe that wouldn't be such a bad thing. Except that then we'd probably buy absolutely all our stuff from China, where they don't bother with testing. Just like with the untested "natural products" of completely unknown content we get at the "health store" and dose ourselves with.

Yes, an increasing amount of animal testing is being found to be unnecessary. However, the alternative tests are often expensive and of uncertain reliability. And they may not satisfy the regulators, who are used to interpreting the results from animal tests and are not going to put their jobs on the line approving the results of test they don't find in their rule books.

And despite the horror stories that hit the press, most animal testing is performed under safe and caring conditions by professionals. You want real animal cruelty, think battery-farmed chicken. You'll never eat another one once you find out the conditions under which Perdue and its ilk raise their birds.

James Thurber once related, in words, a cartoon that appeared in Punch in the 1860s. Where a woman rushes in to her husband screaming that their son had just been bitten by a mad dog, and needed to see Louis Pasteur (who had just introduced a rabies vaccine) PDQ. I paraphrase, I don't have the story in front of me:

"But dear, I just published an article in the newspaper slamming Pasteur for his cruelty to rabbits. And at your instigation, too!"

"What are all the rabbits in the world compared to our only child??"

Those who like sausage (or chicken), respect the law, and use cosmetics, should not watch any of these being made. :)

Great line:

#54751 On April 7, 2006 8:51am I was framed said,

"Those who like sausage (or chicken), respect the law, and use cosmetics, should not watch any of these being made."

Well said. Well said.

Later

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.