A tale of two police shootings - half a world apart...

huttriver10's picture
adsense | america | half a world apart | Huttriver 10 Blog | justification | NZ | police shootings

A Tale of Two Police Shootings - half a world apart ...

Reading the American story below made me think of a New Zealand case where a young man was shot by police. But lets go to America first.

1/ America:

An unarmed, mentally ill young man of 18 years could be heard yelling over the phone," I've got a gun!" as his mother made an emergency call.

New York police arrived at the family home and opened fire on the young man in a 20 bullet barrage, according to a transcript of the emergency call released by police recently.

Five police officers opened fire on him, after he allegedly charged them outside of his home with an alleged black object in his hand - a hair brush!

His mother had apparently attempted to have her son hospitalised earlier that day. But she was unsuccessful in convincing authorities of the need for his admission. There is definately no need now!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2/ New Zealand:

Some years ago in Taranaki, New Zealand, a young man in his late twenties left his parents home in the evening in an extremely agitated state. A short time later he was reported to police as being the culprit smashing windows in the town's CBD. Police moved in, ordering him to cease, but he continued on his smashing spree. The police officers again ordered him to desist, but this time he moved towards the leading police officer, armed with a softball bat and golf club.

The leading policeman raised his Glock pistol which had been in the patrol car, and again ordered the man to desist, but he kept moving towards the policeman, who fired a number of shots at him. He fell mortally wounded. and died later.

This case raised a furore within New Zealand at the time because the general public claimed the policeman over-reacted. Apparently a police- dog and handler had been sent from New Plymouth city, only twenty minutes away by road. The dead man's family and members of the general public maintained that the police should have backed off and waited for the dog and handler to arrive.

The policeman was exonerated of any wrong doing at the inquest and ensuing enquiry. But the New Zealand public remains divided over the police action, many years later.

Kiwi Riverman

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wow Hutt

Sassys

I would say that in the case of the American kid...it was murder.
Now in the New Zealand case it could be two ways of looking at it..."Suicide by cop" and also why didn't the cop just shoot the guy in the foot or arm? If he knew that he was waiting for his back up, then it makes sense to shoot NOT to kill. These policemen will eventually reap what they have sewn...not that that is much comfort to the families of these two young men.

Pussy Willow's picture

I've got to side with the police on both counts.

Every hour of every day policemen come in contact with the worst that society has to offer. Their lives are literally in danger with every every traffic stop and every person that they come into contact with. Their nerves are in a 'fight-or-flight' state of alertness every minute that they are on the job - at least they'd better be, if they want to stay alive. Hell, just watch some of those shows on Court TV where patrol officers are beaten, shot, knifed, etc. during routine traffic stops. Did you know that more policemen are killed when responding to domestic disturbance calls than on any other kind of call?

When they are threatened, they react. Yes, mistakes are made. Yes, people who are brandishing hair brushes in bad lighting and threatening bodily harm with golf clubs and bats instead of guns get shot. Yes, people who are not cooperating will be tasered and people who are fighting with police officers will be injured during the scuffle. Personally, I'd rather see the people who are brandishing these "weapons" shot than see a policeman injured or killed.

There's a simple, easy solution to all these issues. When a policeman tells you to stop - STOP! When a policeman tells you to drop your weapon - DROP IT - even if it's just a hair brush. That's the law, after all, and it is there to protect law-abiding citizens.

Everyone makes mistakes. To completely erase mistakes made by police officers we would need to have a force comprised entirely of robots - really, really advanced, mistake-proof robots - and maybe someday we will. But even then, people are going to claim that the robot misunderstood what was happening or misunderstood their intentions. There'll be a whole big controversy over robots mistunderstanding human expressions and body language, etc., etc., etc., and people who are refusing to do what the robot tells them to do will still get injured or killed.

The Willow Does Gary Oldman

huttriver10's picture

Very good comments...

on each side of the spectrum. But did you note a similarity between both shooting victims - they both appeared to have some degree of mental health problems. In NZ we dont have armed patrolling police, there are weapons, pistol and shotgun locked in the boot of the vehicle, or the pistol may be worn if the police are aware of the circumstances they are venturing into. When we look back into many of our serious shootings, mental health problems are evident. We in the West have been quick to do away with asylums or mental hospitals where people can be admitted quickly when their condition is plainly evident. Now we have so many checks and balances it can be some time before people are admitted into a MH unit. To be extremely fair, the police are the meat in the sandwich; they dont enjoy having to pick up the pieces - there is plenty of crime out there - the methamphetamine dealers are causing more pain and mayhem than ever before.

Kiwi Riverman

I too understand the side of the police here...however

Sassys

the one thing that the police did not do in either incidence is think before they shot...hysteria seems to have taken a quick hold, and trigger happy is exactly what happened. They could have used force but they did not need to end a life with said force. Fear is also at the bottom of all this, and yes it could have ended with the death of a policeman but that's what being "in the line of fire" is all about...No one should have died. The mental health issues here are also part of this tragedy, so yeah the police should keep their own heads straight first, before they shoot. Saying STOP to someone who is not in their right mind apparently wont work, but killing someone doesn't work either.

Pussy Willow's picture

Hard to say whether they thought it through carefully

or not. I've never been faced with an enraged person screaming that they have a gun and bearing down on me aggressively but I rather doubt that I would take the time to stop and think, "Now, just how much damage is this guy actually going to do? Maybe I should just take a step back and see if he runs out of steam before I do anything hasty."

Nope, I'm going to shoot first and ask questions later. Aiming for an arm or a leg doesn't cut it, either. A person revved up on adrenaline or drugs won't stop with a wound to an arm or a leg and a shot aimed at that small of a body part has too great a chance of missing and hitting an innocent bystander.

And keep in mind, a person who is armed with a golf club, baseball bat or even a hairbrush, can be lethal. Guns aren't the only things that can cause death or permanent disability.

I'll be the first to stand up and shout that our government is criminally negligent when it comes to caring for mentally ill people. But I will never advocate a policeman putting his safety in jeopardy when trying to handle an out-of-control person with mental illness.

Still, I do wonder about the number of shots fired in these instances. You see scenes in the movies and on TV where the bad guy keeps coming at you after he's been shot several times. I've always assumed that was just theatrics. Maybe it's not. Or maybe the policemen are just too keyed up. Or maybe that's their training - pull that trigger and pull it hard when you life is in danger. I wish we'd get a little more background in the press when stuff like this happens.

The Willow Does Gary Oldman

huttriver10's picture

I agree with...

your comments that things were not thought through - reaction instead of considered action.

Kiwi Riverman

Catfish's picture

I agree with PW here,...

in today's world where perps won't even think twice about shooting copy, which was different than in the past, and if someone presents something that looks like a gun, especially in the first story where the mother obviously passed along to the police what her son said. It's tragic, I will admit.

Having said that, though, I keep wondering about the number of shots that are fired at these guys. I mean, 20 shots seems major league obsessive to me, and one would hope that, in a case like this one, the police could coordinate who's supposed to fire the first shot if a shot hasn't fired from the potential criminal.

Reviews of Everything, reviews and opinions of, well, almost anything!

huttriver10's picture

I agree...

a lot of shots for a man armed with a hairbrush.

Kiwi Riverman

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.